JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Ana Sofia Becerra De Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-570/05. La Peticionaria No Formula Cargos Concretos Tendientes A Señalar Alguna De Las Causales Por Las Cuales La Corte Ha Considerado Procedente La Declaratoria De Nulidad De Sus Decisiones. Termino Para La Presentacion De La Solicitud De Nulidad De Las Sentencias De La Corte Constitucional. Debe Ser Interpuesta Dentro De Los Tres Dias Siguientes A La Notificacion Del Fallo So Pena De Ser Rechazada. Extemporaneidad De La Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-570 De 2005. Rechazado Por Extemporaneo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fallo De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de nulidad
Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Oportunidad y término para presentarla
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR, por extemporanea, la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el apoderado especial de la senora Ana Sofia Becerra de Gonzalez contra la sentencia T-570 de mayo 26 de 2005, proferida por la Sala Novena de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Presidente
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 3cited by 0 →A. 058/06T-570/05 · cited 62 timesT-570/052005A. 063/04 — Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia Su.1159/03 · cited 38 timesA. 063/042004A. 134/05 — Solicitud De Adicion De La Sentencia T-570/05. Improcedencia De La Solicitud De Adicion O Aclaracion De Sentencias De Revision Proferidas Po · cited 1 timesA. 134/052005
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites3
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.